<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Resilience - Latest Comments in Economic Contraction</title><link>http://energybulletin.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://energybulletin.disqus.com/economic_contraction/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:25:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Economic Contraction</title><link>http://resilience.webvanta.com/node/56848#comment-182493555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the significance of the appearance with this article of a cover page from Forbes?  It's a bit annoying to be drawn to an article by the possibility that something significant about energy matters might have been published in Forbes, and not to be able to discover by skimming whether that is so, and then not be able to discover by skimming why the damned thing is there. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidMDelaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Economic Contraction</title><link>http://resilience.webvanta.com/node/56848#comment-180289550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually most people are oblivious to the dire straights we are in ... In general they know something is very, very wrong but not the depth or breadth of the problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our greatest problem at this point is leadership. Both our political and business leaders are willfully misleading the public. Without a consensus the damage will be much, much greater. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mmckinl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Economic Contraction</title><link>http://resilience.webvanta.com/node/56848#comment-179841197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;chilling and a roadmap to the future - forwarned is forarmed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spsaff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:18:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Economic Contraction</title><link>http://resilience.webvanta.com/node/56848#comment-179826988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And then there is peak infrastructure, especially in east coast cities. Your water supply is reliant on water infrastructure that has passed its expected lifetime. But your city is going broke and may not be able to sell bonds to raise the tens of millions of dollars needed to replace it. Hydro dams are also reaching end of lifespans, threatening catastrophic damage downstream. &lt;br&gt;When the toilets stop flushing in east coast cities, there will be outbreaks of disease usually only associated with third world countries. And city fire suppression will become difficult as water delivery systems fail without the tax and bond funding to replace aging infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Economic Contraction</title><link>http://resilience.webvanta.com/node/56848#comment-179796832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article, I cannot wait to read the other parts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SVTransitiongroup</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>